I attack ideas. I don't attack people. And some very good people have some very bad ideas. And if you can't separate the two, you gotta get another day job. You don't want to be a judge. At least not a judge on a multi-member panel. Antonin Scalia attackbadday share on social
I try to be an honest originalist! I will take the bitter with the sweet! Antonin Scalia bitterhonestoriginalist Change image and share on social
To allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation. Antonin Scalia considerfundamentalhighly share on social
If we're picking people to draw out of their own conscience and experience a 'new' Constitution, we should not look principally for good lawyers. We should look to people who agree with us. When we are in that mode, you realize we have rendered the Constitution useless. Antonin Scalia agreeconscienceconstitution share on social
I'm not a scientist. That's why I don't want to have to deal with global warming, to tell you the truth. Antonin Scalia dealglobalscientist Change image and share on social
There is nothing new in the realization that the Constitution sometimes insulates the criminality of a few in order to protect the privacy of us all. Antonin Scalia constitutioncriminalityinsulate Change image and share on social
You could have 50 different states having 50 different regulations... until they were all litigated out. Antonin Scalia litigateregulationstate Change image and share on social
If we cannot have moral feelings against homosexuality, can we have it against murder? Can we have it against other things? Antonin Scalia feelinghomosexualitymoral Change image and share on social
As a general rule, I do not think it appropriate for judges to heap either praise or censure upon a legislative measure that comes before them, lest it be thought that their validation, invalidation, or interpretation of it is driven by their desire to expand or constrict what they personally approve or disapprove as a matter of policy. Antonin Scalia approvecensureconstrict share on social
What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean? Antonin Scalia halfwayinterpretationmean Change image and share on social